Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 23:47:50 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 223099] security/boringssl: conflicts with other ssl ports Message-ID: <bug-223099-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D223099 Bug ID: 223099 Summary: security/boringssl: conflicts with other ssl ports Product: Ports & Packages Version: Latest Hardware: Any OS: Any Status: New Severity: Affects Some People Priority: --- Component: Individual Port(s) Assignee: swills@FreeBSD.org Reporter: z7dr6ut7gs@snkmail.com Assignee: swills@FreeBSD.org Flags: maintainer-feedback?(swills@FreeBSD.org) Should this port be marked to CONFLICT with openssl, etc.? Or is it sufficient to rely on pkg(8) to detect conflict when the package install is attempted. The downside for that would be that users don't get presented with the conflict until after build + stage. Maybe that's okay - that policy would avoid the manual management of CONFLICTS* settings. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-223099-13>