From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 5 20:00:06 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E892916A401 for ; Thu, 5 Apr 2007 20:00:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from harmony.bsdimp.com (vc4-2-0-87.dsl.netrack.net [199.45.160.85]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95B0E13C45A for ; Thu, 5 Apr 2007 20:00:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.bsdimp.com (8.13.8/8.13.4) with ESMTP id l35JxOue085918; Thu, 5 Apr 2007 13:59:25 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2007 13:59:24 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <20070405.135924.85327487.imp@bsdimp.com> To: nikolas.britton@gmail.com From: Warner Losh In-Reply-To: References: <20070405103708.GC842@turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org> X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0 (harmony.bsdimp.com [127.0.0.1]); Thu, 05 Apr 2007 13:59:25 -0600 (MDT) Cc: peterjeremy@optushome.com.au, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Do we need this junk? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2007 20:00:07 -0000 > Revision 1.33: Jan 2005 (2 years, 2 months ago) by imp > > Final attempt to make aha 1542A working. If not, oh well, I don't > have the card and no way to reproduce problems. We do this by > applying the workaround to firmware revsion 0. But all the other 1542 cards I have work just fine (A is a really really old and somewhat rare version of the 1542 card). After I made this commit, people gave me a card, but I've not had a chance to try it out. As to your characterization that it is junk, you are just flat out wrong. There's no other way to say it. Warner