From owner-freebsd-hardware Wed Aug 20 01:32:43 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id BAA08507 for hardware-outgoing; Wed, 20 Aug 1997 01:32:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (ala-ca13-16.ix.netcom.com [204.32.168.48]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id BAA08500 for ; Wed, 20 Aug 1997 01:32:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.8.7/8.6.9) id BAA01106; Wed, 20 Aug 1997 01:32:31 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 20 Aug 1997 01:32:31 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199708200832.BAA01106@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> To: tom@sdf.com CC: hardware@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: (message from Tom Samplonius on Tue, 19 Aug 1997 13:55:38 -0700 (PDT)) Subject: Re: parity errors From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk * > I think so. There are 36 identical-looking chips on each module. * > I've never seen such big SIMMs before. * * It is hard to find motherboards that support SIMMs with that many chips. * Most are 24 or less. Well, it appeared to work on my Asus P6NP5. I tried two make worlds, and a 12-hour session in which I ran five emacs compiles continuously in parallel. Not a single seg fault. Satoshi