Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 18 May 2001 17:42:06 +0200
From:      Andre Albsmeier <andre.albsmeier@mchp.siemens.de>
To:        "Hartmann, O." <ohartman@klima.physik.uni-mainz.de>
Cc:        Andre Albsmeier <andre.albsmeier@mchp.siemens.de>, John Polstra <jdp@polstra.com>, stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: NIS/YP problems after cvsupdate
Message-ID:  <20010518174206.B50521@curry.mchp.siemens.de>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.33.0105181734290.16488-100000@klima.physik.uni-mainz.de>; from ohartman@klima.physik.uni-mainz.de on Fri, May 18, 2001 at 05:38:36PM %2B0200
References:  <20010517175205.A69570@curry.mchp.siemens.de> <Pine.BSF.4.33.0105181734290.16488-100000@klima.physik.uni-mainz.de>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 18-May-2001 at 17:38:36 +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote:
> On Thu, 17 May 2001, Andre Albsmeier wrote:
> 
> All right.
> 
> I read the content of that bug report and I did the following:
> 
> We have two slave servers within our domain, sometimes I did tests
> with a third and a third is coming soon as a constant part of this domain.
> So we have definitely more or equal than two servers in our domain.
> 
> Just a few minutes ago I changed /var/yp/ypservers that way that it reflects only
> one slave server in the domain - and all things run like a charm! No problem!
> 
> I permuted the servers to exclude that the behaviour is not specific to one
> server - and it works with the other one, too. It seems, after I read the
> thread given at the end of this message, that this problem is still a recent
> problem ...

Im really curious whether the patch regarding rtld.c I sent to you
and the list helps in your case as well...

	-Andre
> 
> 
> :>
> :>
> :>On Wed, 16-May-2001 at 12:22:40 -0700, John Polstra wrote:
> :>> In article <Pine.BSF.4.33.0105162018060.13626-100000@klima.physik.uni-mainz.de>,
> :>> Hartmann, O. <ohartman@klima.physik.uni-mainz.de> wrote:
> :>> >
> :>> > Last weekend I did the first cvupdate, yesterday the last one.
> :>> > First thing I realized was that fxp now needs miibus code (??).
> :>> >
> :>> > well, now our master NIS server is stock in sending to the slaves.
> :>> > It gets timeouts and messages about pending transaction processes.
> :>>
> :>> Peter Wemm just fixed a similar problem on ref4.freebsd.org.  He said
> :>> the cause of the problem was a full/half duplex mismatch between the
> :>> NIC and the switch.
> :>>
> :>
> :>It _might_ be related to the old bug described in:
> :>
> :>http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=12496
> :>
> :>I had a similar problem with yppush when ld-elf.so.1 changed.
> :>It seems that the problem reappeared here as well. I will look
> :>at this later when I have more time...
> :>
> :>	-And
> 
> --
> MfG
> O. Hartmann
> 
> ohartman@klima.physik.uni-mainz.de
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> IT-Administration des Institut fuer Physik der Atmosphaere (IPA)
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> Johannes Gutenberg Universitaet Mainz
> Becherweg 21
> 55099 Mainz
> 
> Tel: +496131/3924662 (Maschinensaal)
> Tel: +496131/3924144
> FAX: +496131/3923532

-- 
"One World, One Web, One Program." - Microsoft Promotional Ad.
"Ein Volk, Ein Reich, Ein Fuehrer." - Adolf Hitler

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010518174206.B50521>