From owner-svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Tue Feb 21 16:03:15 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9B8ECE81E0 for ; Tue, 21 Feb 2017 16:03:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mi+thun@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from smtp.rcn.com (smtp.rcn.com [69.168.97.78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A47DA88F for ; Tue, 21 Feb 2017 16:03:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mi+thun@aldan.algebra.com) X_CMAE_Category: , , X-CNFS-Analysis: v=2.2 cv=C6ur8kH+ c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=lGUdY1O6J9NpztYPi32J9g==:117 a=lGUdY1O6J9NpztYPi32J9g==:17 a=r77TgQKjGQsHNAKrUKIA:9 a=5gSpmRxePG8AeA8Lln0A:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=fj17Uwk4mKc23egj0VAA:9 a=51i609FZTPwSB8CP:21 a=_W_S_7VecoQA:10 a=IjZwj45LgO3ly-622nXo:22 X-CM-Score: 0 X-Scanned-by: Cloudmark Authority Engine X-Authed-Username: YW5hdEByY24uY29t Authentication-Results: smtp01.rcn.cmh.synacor.com smtp.mail=mi+thun@aldan.algebra.com; spf=neutral; sender-id=neutral Authentication-Results: smtp01.rcn.cmh.synacor.com header.from=mi+thun@aldan.algebra.com; sender-id=neutral Authentication-Results: smtp01.rcn.cmh.synacor.com smtp.user=anat; auth=pass (PLAIN) Received-SPF: neutral (smtp01.rcn.cmh.synacor.com: 108.53.87.28 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of aldan.algebra.com) Received: from [108.53.87.28] ([108.53.87.28:63861] helo=aldan.narawntapu) by smtp.rcn.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 3.6.23.54417 r(Core:3.6.23.0)) with ESMTPSA (cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA) id 1E/6A-55855-0C46CA85; Tue, 21 Feb 2017 11:03:12 -0500 Subject: Re: Misuse of PORTREVISION (Re: svn commit: r434379 - head/multimedia/x265) To: Mathieu Arnold , Jan Beich , ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org References: <20170218210541.82AA915F6@freefall.freebsd.org> From: "Mikhail T." Message-ID: Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 11:03:11 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23 X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 16:03:16 -0000 On 21.02.2017 10:52, Mathieu Arnold wrote: >> Just did. But I believe, our usage of PORTREVISION is wrong-headed. > I completely agree. The problem is that portupgrade/portmaster do not > handle shlib bumps and do not force rebuilding depending ports. If you > want to fix those tools to behave in a better way, please do so. I'm neither the author nor a maintainer of these tools. But I'm glad we agree on the underlying problem. > In the mean time, when some shlib version is bumped, all consumers must > have their PORTREVISION bumped. The tools have been broken in this manner /for years/ -- why would they ever change, if PORTREVISION is bumped every time? And, when it is not, PortMgr-officials go hunting the offender -- instead of the actual authors/maintainers of the broken tools? -mi