From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 15 04:27:06 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F1D6DFD for ; Sun, 15 Jun 2014 04:27:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ob0-x232.google.com (mail-ob0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::232]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB4F32E1E for ; Sun, 15 Jun 2014 04:27:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ob0-f178.google.com with SMTP id wn1so4464970obc.9 for ; Sat, 14 Jun 2014 21:27:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=AU7Q+BK8Y66iEspspvptMhxpDIKhCRqFvutbYAISoEk=; b=ULDqIa+o/FqmbmoY38+ruRsFrG0h+phLnJ7JVLWVCiTfiRa1RZrThR/i6aYns7/kSa lvKFv3UL02MCw7Pe+XIZS2LzS4odS7lrWzfyca/kn1MT1lgEJydQ71qN6PS/o/TeQBHC HjfNCYNXWPD5UdmEbspjEbZYv9UK1nG2GkZsjwAgL8isMz9rEdhGJRrHXRaY28Ci4mKh Ljn7nckw1Om0C2GNjivhHLLc+rDtRrS9phipxiph+M9o5AaJKPACI3CjOT1bU+iOV8D8 wqeG1qzVtfsBP8+GHjwvH/D6g0Y1vd7ZLjDgJjwzEG6KO/l1orhAyOd2lDbtoYGOpHKD NIMA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.60.42 with SMTP id e10mr12264769obr.33.1402806424910; Sat, 14 Jun 2014 21:27:04 -0700 (PDT) Sender: kob6558@gmail.com Received: by 10.202.93.133 with HTTP; Sat, 14 Jun 2014 21:27:04 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1402781002411-5920851.post@n5.nabble.com> References: <1402781002411-5920851.post@n5.nabble.com> Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2014 00:27:04 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 10KieLqAbinPaPobI2CWsq2uKFE Message-ID: Subject: Re: FreeBSD 10.0-STABLE #0 r267451 amd64 schedular strangeness? From: Kevin Oberman To: Jakub Lach Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18 Cc: FreeBSD-STABLE Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2014 04:27:06 -0000 On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 5:23 PM, Jakub Lach wrote: > I don't know what's going on with scheduler now, I had > libreoffice compile going for 8h (strange) and then saw > in top -P something like "98.9% nice" > > Any ideas? > > This is something recent. > I am now rebuilding libreoffice. I had to "set MAKE_JOBS_SAFE=yes" to get it to go far. Otherwise it dies rather quickly on my 10-STABLE/amd64 system. It is very slow when not doing parallel builds.. If you are building with portmaster, by default all builds are "nice", so 98.8% seems about right if all processors are working on it. -- R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer, Retired E-mail: rkoberman@gmail.com