From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Apr 17 13:13:34 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 649B837B405
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Thu, 17 Apr 2003 13:13:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.nsu.ru (mx.nsu.ru [212.192.164.5])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 291CB43F93
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Thu, 17 Apr 2003 13:13:33 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from fjoe@iclub.nsu.ru)
Received: from mail by mx.nsu.ru with drweb-scanned (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 196FiK-0000QT-00; Fri, 18 Apr 2003 03:10:32 +0700
Received: from iclub.nsu.ru ([193.124.215.97] ident=root)
	by mx.nsu.ru with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 196FXi-0004zO-00; Fri, 18 Apr 2003 02:59:34 +0700
Received: from iclub.nsu.ru (fjoe@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by iclub.nsu.ru (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h3HJwYud097218;
	Fri, 18 Apr 2003 02:58:34 +0700 (NSS)
	(envelope-from fjoe@iclub.nsu.ru)
Received: (from fjoe@localhost)
	by iclub.nsu.ru (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h3HJwX86097217;
	Fri, 18 Apr 2003 02:58:34 +0700 (NSS)
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2003 02:58:33 +0700
From: Max Khon <fjoe@iclub.nsu.ru>
To: John Polstra <jdp@polstra.com>
Message-ID: <20030418025833.A97164@iclub.nsu.ru>
References: <20030417141133.GA4155@madman.celabo.org>
	<20030417144449.GA4530@madman.celabo.org>
	<200304171535.h3HFZEFs094589@strings.polstra.com>
	<20030418014500.B94094@iclub.nsu.ru>
	<200304171944.h3HJi1jK095151@strings.polstra.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <200304171944.h3HJi1jK095151@strings.polstra.com>;
	from jdp@polstra.com on Thu, Apr 17, 2003 at 12:44:01PM -0700
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=5.0
	tests=IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,
	      USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_MUTT
	version=2.43
X-Envelope-To: jdp@polstra.com,
 current@freebsd.org
X-Bogosity: No, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=0.11.1.4
cc: current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: HEADS UP: new NSS
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2003 20:13:34 -0000

hi, there!

On Thu, Apr 17, 2003 at 12:44:01PM -0700, John Polstra wrote:

> > > You might want to look at how libpam handles this situation.  In the
> > > static case, all of the known modules are linked into it statically.
> > > Then they are located and registered at runtime by means of a linker
> > > set.
> > 
> > statically linking pam_ldap to /bin/ls will be a nightmare :)
> 
> True, but why would /bin/ls need anything from PAM at all?  It
> doesn't currently use PAM.

sorry, I mean nss_ldap, of course

/fjoe