From owner-freebsd-multimedia Tue Oct 7 10:11:12 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id KAA11487 for multimedia-outgoing; Tue, 7 Oct 1997 10:11:12 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-multimedia) Received: from whqvax.picker.com (whqvax.picker.com [144.54.1.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id KAA11479 for ; Tue, 7 Oct 1997 10:11:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rhh@ct.picker.com) Received: from ct.picker.com by whqvax.picker.com with SMTP; Tue, 7 Oct 1997 13:09:57 -0400 (EDT) Received: from elmer.ct.picker.com by ct.picker.com (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA03998; Tue, 7 Oct 97 13:09:55 EDT Received: by elmer.ct.picker.com (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id NAA02831; Tue, 7 Oct 1997 13:05:56 -0400 Message-Id: <19971007130556.58906@ct.picker.com> Date: Tue, 7 Oct 1997 13:05:56 -0400 From: Randall Hopper To: Amancio Hasty Cc: multimedia@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [video] frame rate and fxtv (REPOST) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.81 Sender: owner-freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Another one I sent last night that didn't get out. Randall -----Forwarded message----- Date: Mon, 6 Oct 1997 21:09:19 -0400 From: Randall Hopper Subject: Re: [video] frame rate and fxtv Amancio Hasty: |So far I have received the following information from brooktree and I |can't seem to get the set frame rate functionality to work properly |on single frames and with odd/even frames. | |For now, I suggest that fxtv emulates the frame rate functionality by |specifying the full frame rate and skipping frames based upon the |desired frame rate for video capture. Thanks for forwarding the info from Brooktree. I'll take another crack at the driver code with their comments as soon as I get the features I'm currently adding to Fxtv in a good state. If still no luck with decimation, I'll try your suggestion and run some performance tests. The loss of memory- and mem-to-PCI-disk bandwidth due to a full-bandwidth Bt-to-mem stream may not really be significant due to the write latency of disk subsystem with most hard disks. If so, I'll go that route. Thanks for the suggestion. Randall -----End of forwarded message-----