From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 5 20:46:02 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B6F3106566C; Sat, 5 Apr 2008 20:46:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from emaste@freebsd.org) Received: from gw.sandvine.com (gw.sandvine.com [199.243.201.138]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 266878FC17; Sat, 5 Apr 2008 20:46:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from emaste@freebsd.org) Received: from labgw2.phaedrus.sandvine.com ([192.168.3.11]) by gw.sandvine.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Sat, 5 Apr 2008 16:34:00 -0400 Received: by labgw2.phaedrus.sandvine.com (Postfix, from userid 12627) id 528ED11618; Sat, 5 Apr 2008 16:34:00 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2008 16:34:00 -0400 From: Ed Maste To: John Baldwin Message-ID: <20080405203400.GA89620@sandvine.com> References: <200804051421.m35EL2nW026104@repoman.freebsd.org> <200804051350.20354.jhb@freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200804051350.20354.jhb@freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-OriginalArrivalTime: 05 Apr 2008 20:34:00.0517 (UTC) FILETIME=[614B4F50:01C8975C] Cc: Takanori Watanabe , src-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, cvs-src@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/dev/acpica/Osd OsdSynch.c X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2008 20:46:02 -0000 On Sat, Apr 05, 2008 at 01:50:20PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > On Saturday 05 April 2008 10:21:01 am Takanori Watanabe wrote: > > takawata 2008-04-05 14:21:01 UTC > > > > FreeBSD src repository > > > > Modified files: > > sys/dev/acpica/Osd OsdSynch.c > > Log: > > GPE lock may recurse on resume path. > > I think there were two PR's for this? I think it was the Global lock that got > recursed on in at least one instance rather than the GPE lock too. It would > be nice if we could only tag certain ACPI locks with recursion rather than > all of them. :( The PRs I'm aware of are kern/114649 and kern/114113. -Ed