From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jan  6 17:59:09 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA6F416A4CE
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Tue,  6 Jan 2004 17:59:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from root.org (root.org [67.118.192.226])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9BE6543D49
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Tue,  6 Jan 2004 17:59:07 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from nate@root.org)
Received: (qmail 28301 invoked by uid 1000); 7 Jan 2004 01:59:09 -0000
Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2004 17:59:09 -0800 (PST)
From: Nate Lawson <nate@root.org>
To: Doug White <dwhite@gumbysoft.com>
In-Reply-To: <20040106164230.Y97411@carver.gumbysoft.com>
Message-ID: <20040106175242.A28273@root.org>
References: <20040106145355.Y27817@root.org>
	<20040106164230.Y97411@carver.gumbysoft.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
cc: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>
cc: current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: IRQ routing debugging help
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2004 01:59:09 -0000

On Tue, 6 Jan 2004, Doug White wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Jan 2004, Nate Lawson wrote:
>
> > Not only is intpin 1 is missing from ACPI but intpin 7 appears.  This
> > means your lpt0 probably works only with ACPI.  :)
>
> It fails to detect in both cases.
>
> For this particular instance, I'm now trying increasing the kbd reset
> delays. It may just be recalicitrant hardware. But it may also be
> something screwy in the ACPI. All the ISA devices look at an enable bit in
> system I/O space and skip their _CRS functions if its cleared.
>
> I'll start a new thread on this since its not routing-related.

Getting the output from your _STA methods matched to each Device object
would be good.  Stick a printf at the end of acpi_DeviceIsPresent() using
AcpiNsHandleToPathname() (see acpi_UserNotify for an example) and also
print out the _STA value.  Then we'll know which objects return which _STA
values.

-Nate