From owner-freebsd-ports Wed Dec 20 8:11: 5 2000 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 20 08:11:04 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from pcwin002.win.tue.nl (pcwin002.win.tue.nl [131.155.71.72]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BE3037B400; Wed, 20 Dec 2000 08:11:04 -0800 (PST) Received: by pcwin002.win.tue.nl (Postfix, from userid 1001) id CF3BC13488; Wed, 20 Dec 2000 17:10:59 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2000 17:10:59 +0100 From: Stijn Hoop To: Maxim Sobolev Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What's wrong with Mozilla 0.6? Message-ID: <20001220171059.G4514@pcwin002.win.tue.nl> References: <3A40CDEB.7D5D73F1@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <3A40CDEB.7D5D73F1@FreeBSD.org>; from sobomax@freebsd.org on Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 05:19:07PM +0200 Sender: stijn@pcwin002.win.tue.nl Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi, On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 05:19:07PM +0200, Maxim Sobolev wrote: > I noticed that Mozilla 0.6 was released about a week ago. Are there any > reasons why we still do not have it in our ports tree? Presumably because it doesn't run on 4-STABLE right now? See the thread on -stable (mozilla and 4.2-RELEASE). FWIW, the fixes from Daniel Eischen from message <977175292.3a3e82fcc5d68@webmail.harmonic.co.il> work for me as of the latest nightly (20001222), and boy, is the new mozilla *FAST*. But the fix hasn't gone into -STABLE yet (it might not even be the correct one), which means that mozilla-0.6 will coredump on -STABLE afaik. --Stijn To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message