Date: Wed, 10 May 2017 21:54:59 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 219201] [patch] sysutils/bareos-server readline isn't being found by configure Message-ID: <bug-219201-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D219201 Bug ID: 219201 Summary: [patch] sysutils/bareos-server readline isn't being found by configure Product: Ports & Packages Version: Latest Hardware: Any OS: Any Status: New Keywords: patch Severity: Affects Some People Priority: --- Component: Individual Port(s) Assignee: acm@FreeBSD.org Reporter: rand@iteris.com Assignee: acm@FreeBSD.org Keywords: patch Flags: maintainer-feedback?(acm@FreeBSD.org) Created attachment 182489 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D182489&action= =3Dedit Patch to correctly locate the readline tool The configure script with Bareos is only looking in /usr/include for readli= ne when "--with-readline=3Dyes" is specified: checking /usr/include/readline/readline.h usability... no checking /usr/include/readline/readline.h presence... no checking for /usr/include/readline/readline.h... no With the trivial change to the Makefile (really trivial patch attached) of using "--with-readline=3D${PREFIX}" readline is correctly located and inclu= ded: checking /usr/local/include/readline/readline.h usability... yes checking /usr/local/include/readline/readline.h presence... yes checking for /usr/local/include/readline/readline.h... yes This makes the bconsole command much nicer to use. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-219201-13>