From owner-freebsd-questions Wed Aug 18 11:39:58 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from cs.rpi.edu (mumble.cs.rpi.edu [128.213.8.16]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A97B14E30 for ; Wed, 18 Aug 1999 11:39:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from crossd@cs.rpi.edu) Received: from cs.rpi.edu (monica.cs.rpi.edu [128.213.7.2]) by cs.rpi.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA76355; Wed, 18 Aug 1999 14:38:55 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <199908181838.OAA76355@cs.rpi.edu> To: Stanford Mings Cc: questions@FreeBSD.ORG, crossd@cs.rpi.edu Subject: Re: FreeBSD 3.2 In-Reply-To: Message from Stanford Mings of "Wed, 18 Aug 1999 14:16:34 EDT." Date: Wed, 18 Aug 1999 14:38:55 -0400 From: "David E. Cross" Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Yes, a couple of us are working to correct this problem. We hope to have something RSN. It is because IBM does some stuff "differently" than everyone else. It appears to be related to int 0x13 handling in the BIOS, but that is just me making wild speculation at this point. -- David Cross | email: crossd@cs.rpi.edu Systems Administrator/Research Programmer | Web: http://www.cs.rpi.edu/~crossd Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, | Ph: 518.276.2860 Department of Computer Science | Fax: 518.276.4033 I speak only for myself. | WinNT:Linux::Linux:FreeBSD To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message