From nobody Wed Jun 29 02:58:38 2022 X-Original-To: questions@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2418D87BA45 for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2022 02:58:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hw@adminart.net) Received: from mo4-p00-ob.smtp.rzone.de (mo4-p00-ob.smtp.rzone.de [85.215.255.21]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "*.smtp.rzone.de", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass Class 2 CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4LXmPf5mdNz580B for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2022 02:58:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hw@adminart.net) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1656471518; s=strato-dkim-0002; d=adminart.net; h=References:In-Reply-To:Date:To:From:Subject:Message-ID:Cc:Date:From: Subject:Sender; bh=4vuiKhovYX+/v80JNly6jYgCJuT0wtD2K24FM3nHmVg=; b=TP7XyahdVYqRq5gBjMm0NmLZW6QtjTNDGbMvNspkkAhQc8t2hhNpy5n9KUgwSHkYx4 qX3Y0KZHCIoJOP9I19ofo5hPNai18JtlDodFr9snikvKJJc7psEvcqVj0JBa511fL0+o vqvq2Uqt0YdHLiUfVvn1kl9HPOtlqbnLsbQzIT7elvrbV3ZnO0ASnCXy67iuakSdxHwx PAh66woJrpyh1qfNNT+u4rZ3/cAsoMoyvUY6Aa8thKm8F20e3NI9V6IZ54CnyzcFr81O 1Jvj/sD1WHKL1MSM3WT4797U25qqCwkDy6KHz3h16RvmfdMGl0JvvkvVfC9+a374s1gu O7EA== X-RZG-AUTH: ":O2kGeEG7b/pS1Ey9Rna9iAZFrfz26y6zbtmqiE/f0+UVPWzfkhbRoUzSCTTNnjIupuXQshKqSDswFYxQxxClR+7AkQj+sG7OF/WVQgGZZ3hmY9Si" X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo00 Received: from [IPv6:2a09:8e40:1dba:3500:fa8d:b1f2:30b5:72c5] by smtp.strato.de (RZmta 47.46.0 AUTH) with ESMTPSA id h79331y5T2wcFN8 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2022 04:58:38 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: Subject: Re: hardware recommendation From: hw To: questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2022 04:58:38 +0200 In-Reply-To: References: <89298009-9622-4E30-AD03-0A35220DA004@riseup.net> <799dcfe5a11e423c3e67c1fe5d5de6acd8953be8.camel@adminart.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.44.2 (3.44.2-1.fc36) List-Id: User questions List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-questions List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4LXmPf5mdNz580B X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=adminart.net header.s=strato-dkim-0002 header.b=TP7Xyahd; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of hw@adminart.net has no SPF policy when checking 85.215.255.21) smtp.mailfrom=hw@adminart.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.27 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[adminart.net:s=strato-dkim-0002]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[questions@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[adminart.net]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.03)[0.034]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[adminart.net:+]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[85.215.255.21:from]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[questions]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:6724, ipnet:85.215.255.0/24, country:DE]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N On Tue, 2022-06-28 at 21:45 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: >=20 >=20 > > On 28 Jun 2022, at 20:24, hw wrote: > >=20 > > > On Tue, 2022-06-28 at 20:15 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > > > =EF=BB=BF > > > > > On 28. Jun 2022, at 19:40, infoomatic > > > > > wrote: > > > > > =EF=BB=BF>On 28.06.22 19:21, Robert Huff wrote > > > > > A disk drive on one of my machines is dying. > > > > > I'd like to replace it with a _reliable_ (the old one lasted > > > > > 10+ > > > > > years at moderate loads) consumer-grade SATA II or higher > > > > > drive > > > > > of at > > > > > least 500 gbytes. > > > >=20 > > > > In the light of the link to backblaze, my mail seems quite > > > > useless > > > > ... I > > >=20 > > > Hi, > > >=20 > > > no, your reply is _not_ useless. > >=20 > > Who are you to decide which replies are useless and which aren't? > >=20 > > > 1. > > > All tests and user experiences are useless > >=20 > > That's a useless reply --- because it's not true. >=20 > I'm a user with decades of experience. > You did not quote the hole sentence. Quoting the whole sentence wouldn't have made your statement any more true. Are your decades of experince useless just because things change over time? I don't think so ...