From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Jun 2 22:40:53 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id WAA00340 for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 2 Jun 1995 22:40:53 -0700 Received: from crh.cl.msu.edu (crh.cl.msu.edu [35.8.1.24]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with SMTP id WAA00329 for ; Fri, 2 Jun 1995 22:40:47 -0700 Message-Id: <199506030540.WAA00329@freefall.cdrom.com> Received: by crh.cl.msu.edu (1.38.193.4/16.2) id AA25398; Sat, 3 Jun 1995 01:40:40 -0400 From: Charles Henrich Subject: Re: A performance mystery To: rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com (Rodney W. Grimes) Date: Sat, 3 Jun 1995 01:40:40 -0400 (EDT) Cc: henrich@crh.cl.msu.edu, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <199506030510.WAA09409@gndrsh.aac.dev.com> from "Rodney W. Grimes" at Jun 2, 95 10:10:47 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] Content-Type: text Content-Length: 480 Sender: hackers-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk > Notice the fact these numbers are *IDENTICAL*, but yours are not, > again something does not add up :-( I am as baffled as you are, I just do not understand how the Compaq with such miserable memory performance (how exactly do you build a computer so that reads are *slower* than writes?) and much slower CPU can do so well in the overall. -Crh Charles Henrich Michigan State University henrich@crh.cl.msu.edu http://rs560.msu.edu/~henrich/