From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu May 15 11:18:48 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id LAA05339 for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 15 May 1997 11:18:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rocky.mt.sri.com (rocky.mt.sri.com [206.127.76.100]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id LAA05328 for ; Thu, 15 May 1997 11:18:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from nate@localhost) by rocky.mt.sri.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) id MAA01989; Thu, 15 May 1997 12:15:10 -0600 (MDT) Date: Thu, 15 May 1997 12:15:10 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <199705151815.MAA01989@rocky.mt.sri.com> From: Nate Williams MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Terry Lambert Cc: rcarter@consys.com (Russell L. Carter), pgiffuni@fps.biblos.unal.edu.co, fenyo@email.enst.fr, hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Cluster Computing in BSD In-Reply-To: <199705151725.KAA15126@phaeton.artisoft.com> References: <199705151553.IAA22312@conceptual.com> <199705151725.KAA15126@phaeton.artisoft.com> X-Mailer: VM 6.29 under 19.15 XEmacs Lucid Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > The difference between "could" and "does" is the > > reason for the failure of (nearly) every business unit that sold > > highly parallel/cluster systems. > > Except Goodyear. And Thinking Machines Corp. And Cray Computing. > And Cray Research. And Fujitsu. And... Hmm, how many of these are still in business selling highly parallel systems? Sounds like failure to me... Nate