From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 31 12:25:49 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48EE816A4CF for ; Wed, 31 May 2006 12:25:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from chylonia.3miasto.net (chylonia.3miasto.net [213.192.74.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D3A643D53 for ; Wed, 31 May 2006 12:25:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from chylonia.3miasto.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by chylonia.3miasto.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k4VCPirX092723; Wed, 31 May 2006 14:25:44 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by chylonia.3miasto.net (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) with ESMTP id k4VCPibx092720; Wed, 31 May 2006 14:25:44 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) X-Authentication-Warning: chylonia.3miasto.net: wojtek owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 14:25:44 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar X-X-Sender: wojtek@chylonia.3miasto.net To: Nikolas Britton In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20060531142230.A91987@chylonia.3miasto.net> References: <20060531093224.GA2508@aurora.oekb.co.at> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: Ewald Jenisch , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Selecting CPU/architecture for new system? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 12:25:53 -0000 > > Do you need more then 4GB of RAM, if so then your only option is 64-bit. not true. but it's true if you need over 3GB of VM for single process. > >> o) Is FreeBSD 6.1 considered equally stable under the i386 >> architecture as under any of the 64bit architectures? >> > > Sure, and you can still run i386 FreeBSD on a 64-bit chip. this way it doesn't make sense of buying 64-bit hardware. i use FreeBSD/amd64 (6.0) and it works excellent. > >> o) Anything else to consider in this context? >> > > Code compiling is very fast on AMDs chip thanks to HyperTransport and > the on-die memory controller, if your task can take advantage of this > AMD is your best bet. other tasks get from this adventage too, maybe not that much. lowest end AMD64 machines gets same memory bandwidth that high end P4 machines for 1/10 price :) (and still having lower latency).