Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2012 15:56:09 +0200 From: Mel Flynn <rflynn@acsalaska.net> To: Kevin Oberman <kob6558@gmail.com> Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org>, Vitaly Magerya <vmagerya@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] New framework options aka optionng Message-ID: <4FC8C9F9.60802@acsalaska.net> In-Reply-To: <CAN6yY1tp2-n1DGq6=uT2bVo-sAqP8bwYj%2BL9OG_zNKm=vpejEQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <4301C0E3-3C53-46E2-B5A5-7BD120CD775F@FreeBSD.org> <4FC5F794.9050506@gmail.com> <4FC68FC0.1010707@FreeBSD.org> <CAN6yY1tp2-n1DGq6=uT2bVo-sAqP8bwYj%2BL9OG_zNKm=vpejEQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 30-5-2012 23:33, Kevin Oberman wrote: I > suspect it is ALMOST always an all or nothing issue, not per port. You'll have all full coverage if you provide "ifnodep" as a choice. The things I don't want docs for on machines that have docs, are always for that reason. Well, one exception, some port I don't recall actually had a >200 meg docs only download for it. I normally don't mind, but I do when they throttle me to 100kB/s. -- Mel
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4FC8C9F9.60802>