From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Apr 18 18: 5:32 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from buffnet4.buffnet.net (buffnet4.buffnet.net [205.246.19.13]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FD1137B5D7 for ; Tue, 18 Apr 2000 18:05:30 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from shovey@buffnet.net) Received: from buffnet11.buffnet.net (buffnet11.buffnet.net [205.246.19.55]) by buffnet4.buffnet.net (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id VAA42028 for ; Tue, 18 Apr 2000 21:05:40 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from shovey@buffnet.net) Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2000 21:05:22 -0400 (EDT) From: Steve Hovey To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Off topic sorta - not a question but a comment Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I saw this today pokin around one of my machines uptime 9:02PM up 108 days, 19:26, 1 user, load averages: 0.00, 0.01, 0.00 As a person who began with mini computer unices, and sco - uptimes like that (the load averages values are low at the moment, but its a heavily used outbound smtp, web, etc server) really freaks me out periodically at how stable and robust freebsd is. I wonder sometimes if the people who wrote and continue writing and working on its continuing evolution, really know just how uniquely wonderful a thing they've done and are doing. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message