From owner-cvs-all Fri Jul 9 11:13:15 1999 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from overcee.netplex.com.au (overcee.netplex.com.au [202.12.86.7]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D53D1567B; Fri, 9 Jul 1999 11:13:10 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from peter@netplex.com.au) Received: from netplex.com.au (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by overcee.netplex.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05BFA79; Sat, 10 Jul 1999 02:13:10 +0800 (WST) (envelope-from peter@netplex.com.au) X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 To: Matt Jacob Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/alpha/include reg.h src/sys/alpha/alpha procfs_machdep.c In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 09 Jul 1999 10:48:23 MST." <199907091748.KAA74546@freefall.freebsd.org> Date: Sat, 10 Jul 1999 02:13:09 +0800 From: Peter Wemm Message-Id: <19990709181310.05BFA79@overcee.netplex.com.au> Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk Matt Jacob wrote: > mjacob 1999/07/09 10:48:23 PDT > > Modified files: > sys/alpha/include reg.h > sys/alpha/alpha procfs_machdep.c > Log: > Add in dbregs stubs that a committer for changes on the i386 ought to have done. I was just about to commit a change to conditionalize the procfs code for this feature. Does the Alpha support an equivalent feature? (ie: should we stub it out until the details are filled in, or conditionalize it so we don't add bogus files in /proc?) Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm - peter@FreeBSD.org; peter@yahoo-inc.com; peter@netplex.com.au To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message