From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Apr 4 15: 9:12 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from rjk191.rh.psu.edu (RJK191.rh.psu.edu [128.118.193.182]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4466937B8FA for ; Tue, 4 Apr 2000 15:09:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ray@rjk191.rh.psu.edu) Received: (from ray@localhost) by rjk191.rh.psu.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) id SAA05720; Tue, 4 Apr 2000 18:08:56 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from ray) Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2000 18:08:56 -0400 From: Ray Kohler To: void Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 5.0-CURRENT to 4.0-STABLE Message-ID: <20000404180856.A5698@rjk191.rh.psu.edu> Reply-To: rjk191@psu.edu References: <20000404194221.A14307@firedrake.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: <20000404194221.A14307@firedrake.org>; from float@firedrake.org on Tue, Apr 04, 2000 at 07:42:22PM +0100 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, Apr 04, 2000 at 07:42:22PM +0100, void wrote: > Well, I accidentally brought my machine onto the 5.0 branch by not > editing my supfile when the versions changed. I'd like to track > 4.0-STABLE instead. Does anyone know if it is safe to cvsup to > 4.0-STABLE? I know in general it isn't recommended, but since this is > right after a branch, I thought perhaps it might be feasible. I did this last week. 4-stable and current are so close together it was a trivial build. Just change your supfile tag, cvsup and build as usual. -- Ray Kohler Satellite Safety Tip #14: If you see a bright streak in the sky coming at you, duck. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message