From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 7 07:32:38 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1172D16A4CE for ; Wed, 7 Jul 2004 07:32:38 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.des.no (flood.des.no [217.116.83.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6862543D5C for ; Wed, 7 Jul 2004 07:32:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: by smtp.des.no (Pony Express, from userid 666) id 30925530E; Wed, 7 Jul 2004 09:32:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: from dwp.des.no (des.no [80.203.228.37]) by smtp.des.no (Pony Express) with ESMTP id CA0A05309 for ; Wed, 7 Jul 2004 09:32:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: by dwp.des.no (Postfix, from userid 2602) id ADA8FB85E; Wed, 7 Jul 2004 09:32:29 +0200 (CEST) To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org References: <200407062323.02854.kirk@strauser.com> <20040707043251.GA35651@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <200407062345.24117.kirk@strauser.com> <20040707070012.GC38356@dragon.nuxi.com> From: des@des.no (=?iso-8859-1?q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?=) Date: Wed, 07 Jul 2004 09:32:29 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20040707070012.GC38356@dragon.nuxi.com> (David O'Brien's message of "Wed, 7 Jul 2004 00:00:12 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on flood.des.no X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.63 Subject: Re: Rewrite cvsup & portupgrade in C X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Jul 2004 07:32:38 -0000 "David O'Brien" writes: > I think that everyone that bitches about CVSup being written in Modula-3 > hasn't looked at what the language features of Modula-3 are (OO, good > exceptions, threading built into the language, simple GUI, ...) that they > grossly underestimate the effort to write CVSup in some other language. The problem is not the language itself, but rather the lack of good, portable implementations of said language. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no