From owner-svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Mon Aug 13 13:31:32 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E59F1072E52; Mon, 13 Aug 2018 13:31:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:6074::16:84]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BC7F879AA4; Mon, 13 Aug 2018 13:31:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id B5C051148D; Mon, 13 Aug 2018 13:31:31 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2018 13:31:31 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Jan Beich Cc: Mark Linimon , svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, Mahdi Mokhtari , svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r477036 - in head/databases/mysql80-server: . files Message-ID: <20180813133131.GA46367@FreeBSD.org> References: <201808121910.w7CJAhiQ051528@repo.freebsd.org> <20180812223108.GA20123@lonesome.com> <20180813101157.GA88376@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.5 (2018-04-13) X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2018 13:31:32 -0000 On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 02:01:56PM +0200, Jan Beich wrote: > Alexey Dokuchaev writes: > ... > > Plus sparc64 and others which use gcc by default > > What "others" that are supported by lang/gcc* via USES=compiler:c++11-lib? > Or did you miss GCC isn't really supported by this port? Hmm, admittedly I didn't notice `compiler:c++11-lib' on USES... Never mind then, I was just referring to the fact that clang accepts -msse?? on !x86 and emits a warning, while gcc rejects unsupported options. ./danfe