From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 6 17:02:26 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA69FF08 for ; Mon, 6 Oct 2014 17:02:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from khavrinen.csail.mit.edu (khavrinen.csail.mit.edu [IPv6:2001:470:8b2d:1e1c:21b:21ff:feb8:d7b0]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "khavrinen.csail.mit.edu", Issuer "Client CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 857E39FB for ; Mon, 6 Oct 2014 17:02:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from khavrinen.csail.mit.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by khavrinen.csail.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s96H2OFW094803 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL CN=khavrinen.csail.mit.edu issuer=Client+20CA); Mon, 6 Oct 2014 13:02:24 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from wollman@khavrinen.csail.mit.edu) Received: (from wollman@localhost) by khavrinen.csail.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id s96H2ORA094800; Mon, 6 Oct 2014 13:02:24 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from wollman) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <21554.52000.530951.15561@khavrinen.csail.mit.edu> Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2014 13:02:24 -0400 From: Garrett Wollman To: Rick Macklem Subject: Re: 9.3 NFS client bug? In-Reply-To: <1265026957.57440085.1412374216862.JavaMail.root@uoguelph.ca> References: <21551.6675.236161.476053@khavrinen.csail.mit.edu> <1265026957.57440085.1412374216862.JavaMail.root@uoguelph.ca> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.4 (patch 22) "Instant Classic" XEmacs Lucid X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (khavrinen.csail.mit.edu [127.0.0.1]); Mon, 06 Oct 2014 13:02:24 -0400 (EDT) Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2014 17:02:26 -0000 < said: > 2 - Try an "oldnfs" mount and see if the old client exhibits the same behaviour. Same behavior both old and new. I'm doing binary search now to try to minimize the size of the workload that exhibits the issue. -GAWollman