From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 19 15:01:49 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3387116A41F for ; Sun, 19 Mar 2006 15:01:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joerg@britannica.bec.de) Received: from hydra.bec.de (www.ostsee-abc.de [62.206.222.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA10A43D48 for ; Sun, 19 Mar 2006 15:01:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joerg@britannica.bec.de) Received: from britannica.bec.de (unknown [139.30.252.72]) by hydra.bec.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id B756235707 for ; Sun, 19 Mar 2006 16:01:42 +0100 (CET) Received: by britannica.bec.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 583DE6D0EF; Sun, 19 Mar 2006 16:01:33 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 19 Mar 2006 16:01:33 +0100 From: joerg@britannica.bec.de To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060319150133.GA6390@britannica.bec.de> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org References: <200603171502.k2HF2IV3086523@pinky.frank-behrens.de> <20060317151220.GA26987@britannica.bec.de> <441B09DA.1010902@elischer.org> <20060317192029.GB10869@odin.ac.hmc.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060317192029.GB10869@odin.ac.hmc.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Subject: Re: [RFE] dhclient(8) should send hostname X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Mar 2006 15:01:49 -0000 On Fri, Mar 17, 2006 at 11:20:29AM -0800, Brooks Davis wrote: > I'm inclined to add this feature, possibly with an option to turn it > off. It seems like a useful default and it's what other OSes do. I > don't believe the objection above has much relevance since the actual > update if any is only performed if the DHCP server is configured to make > one. Incorrect DHCP packets sent by DHCP servers are my problem. Side > effects caused by misconfiguration is not. That was partly a misunderstanding on my site. There are two mechanisms for DNS updates used currently: by the server and by the client. At least Windows 2000 and XP default to the later. Joerg