From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 15 11:22:36 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D1D22656 for ; Sun, 15 Jun 2014 11:22:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sam.nabble.com (sam.nabble.com [216.139.236.26]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B3D9B2EF5 for ; Sun, 15 Jun 2014 11:22:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.236.26] (helo=sam.nabble.com) by sam.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Ww8WA-0005n8-9K for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Sun, 15 Jun 2014 04:22:34 -0700 Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2014 04:22:34 -0700 (PDT) From: Jakub Lach To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <1402831354272-5921036.post@n5.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: References: <1402781002411-5920851.post@n5.nabble.com> Subject: Re: FreeBSD 10.0-STABLE #0 r267451 amd64 schedular strangeness? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2014 11:22:36 -0000 Thanks for the reply. The difference in time was probably due to portmaster/building manually, that makes sense. Good catch. FWIW, libreoffice is fine here (FreeBSD 10.0-STABLE #0 r267451 amd64) -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/FreeBSD-10-0-STABLE-0-r267451-amd64-schedular-strangeness-tp5920851p5921036.html Sent from the freebsd-stable mailing list archive at Nabble.com.