From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 5 19:11:49 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D3A7106566B for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 19:11:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aimass@yabarana.com) Received: from mail-wy0-f182.google.com (mail-wy0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E724D8FC13 for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 19:11:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyb34 with SMTP id 34so1422832wyb.13 for ; Fri, 05 Nov 2010 12:11:47 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.23.213 with SMTP id s21mr2427703wbb.84.1288984307438; Fri, 05 Nov 2010 12:11:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.227.145.133 with HTTP; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 12:11:47 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2010 15:11:47 -0400 Message-ID: From: Alejandro Imass To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: ZFS License and Future X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2010 19:11:49 -0000 Hey folks, A while back I started the thread "Troubles on SATA drives ZFS". I decided to bring the zpool down check each disk and re-construct the pool. Nevertheless, I was revising one of the ZFS error message links and Oracle made me create a developer id to access the info. This really pissed me off even more than teh Android suit, so it got me thinking... Maybe I should go back to UFS, CCD, GEOM, etc. instead of continuing to support f***ing Oracle. ZFS was honestly very easy and seemed very reliable and fast, but I would like the opinion and position of people here on ZFS before I continue using it. Many thanks, Alejandro Imass