From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jul 15 17:03:33 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E292B887;
 Tue, 15 Jul 2014 17:03:33 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-qc0-x230.google.com (mail-qc0-x230.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c01::230])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
 Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK))
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 94A162C38;
 Tue, 15 Jul 2014 17:03:33 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-qc0-f176.google.com with SMTP id i17so2686800qcy.35
 for <multiple recipients>; Tue, 15 Jul 2014 10:03:32 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
 :cc:content-type;
 bh=iMBVrtjCfSKPfG17B8jSMStCpaZPSlHA4ZjhYx9eCZE=;
 b=I2KfISOM1kDot+iS/KZRfqrJRL5fe8lm3lzJGpk6Gmom9B2HS9TMPICuTkhGiq57yv
 Ws2VuF9Rw9TO5gGrVlUhZ1ykjA+5KxbERhNAJWxj1YzZ9fG6azhqIrutNGf89GCIq4t2
 nBHer2Cg5niSsDfeCmUSMsyb92YIvkUx/D0+/W1ov2YslcchfwfGxfHoAplRdcsbJc7f
 u6Di7MhVUx26AgYaMWiF4PcI0VI+YLJs3FugXVfxPwt++W64Yl7LeXbrMVh3kcQR2le3
 QOU63VEsGj3lu9Tp91hNLVN1LJGx7j543NFyEd0BxRsXsHNup+6gt5w0exhASOrdMDOc
 ohMw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.224.80.67 with SMTP id s3mr34522754qak.92.1405443812708;
 Tue, 15 Jul 2014 10:03:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.96.73.39 with HTTP; Tue, 15 Jul 2014 10:03:32 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <201407151132.53587.vegeta@tuxpowered.net>
References: <201407151132.53587.vegeta@tuxpowered.net>
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2014 10:03:32 -0700
Message-ID: <CALCpEUFAsdTeVivGqG0LzYWW0J==_vMC6muUjg4VsC5=NaefDQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Why is r250764 not in 9.3?
From: hiren panchasara <hiren.panchasara@gmail.com>
To: Kajetan Staszkiewicz <vegeta@tuxpowered.net>, melifaro@freebsd.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Cc: "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-net>,
 <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
 <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2014 17:03:34 -0000

+ Alexander

On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 2:32 AM, Kajetan Staszkiewicz
<vegeta@tuxpowered.net> wrote:
> The time has come to upgrade my routers to FreeBSD 9.3.
>
> While going through list of patches I had on 9.1, I've noticed that r248070 got
> into 9.3 but r250764 did not. Why is that?

Probably just missed it.

cheers,
Hiren