From owner-freebsd-current Thu Dec 9 3:22: 9 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from overcee.netplex.com.au (overcee.netplex.com.au [202.12.86.7]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4580D155CB for ; Thu, 9 Dec 1999 03:22:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from peter@netplex.com.au) Received: from netplex.com.au (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by overcee.netplex.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A3021CA0; Thu, 9 Dec 1999 19:21:57 +0800 (WST) (envelope-from peter@netplex.com.au) X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 To: YAMAMOTO Shigeru Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: which is right? 'controller pcic0 at isa?' or 'device pcic0 at isa?'? In-Reply-To: Message from YAMAMOTO Shigeru of "Thu, 09 Dec 1999 18:11:27 +0900." <19991209181127N.shigeru@iij.ad.jp> Date: Thu, 09 Dec 1999 19:21:57 +0800 From: Peter Wemm Message-Id: <19991209112157.6A3021CA0@overcee.netplex.com.au> Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG YAMAMOTO Shigeru wrote: > > I wonder about configuration for pcic in -current. > > In GENERIC, '#device pcic0 at isa?' > In LINT and PCCARD, 'controller pcic0 at isa?' "device" is just about the same as "controller", there is only one difference. If you use "controller", then config allows you to have other lines: device foo at pcic0 This is solely to keep config(8) happy. It makes no difference to the kernel at all. > Which is right? > > Thanks, > ------- > YAMAMOTO Shigeru Internet Initiative Japan Inc. > Network Engineering Div. > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message > > Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm - peter@FreeBSD.org; peter@yahoo-inc.com; peter@netplex.com.au To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message