From owner-freebsd-current  Sat Mar  6  8: 8:18 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mail.kersur.net (mail.kersur.net [199.79.199.3])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C1411520E
	for <current@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sat,  6 Mar 1999 08:08:09 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from dswartz@druber.com)
Received: from manticore (manticore.druber.com [207.180.95.108])
	by mail.kersur.net (8.9.1/8.9.1) with SMTP id LAA18733;
	Sat, 6 Mar 1999 11:12:34 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.19990306110744.00992550@mail.kersur.net>
X-Sender: druber@mail.kersur.net
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.5 (32)
Date: Sat, 06 Mar 1999 11:07:44 -0500
To: Brian Feldman <green@unixhelp.org>
From: Dan Swartzendruber <dswartz@druber.com>
Subject: Re: callout changes nit
Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9903061057250.11342-100000@janus.syracuse.ne
 t>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

At 10:59 AM 3/6/99 -0500, Brian Feldman wrote:
>I make a habit of checking out any interesting kernel changes in full, and
one
>thing I found in the recent diff by Mr. Wollman for kern_timeout.c is:
>
>+void
>+callout_init(c)
>+       struct  callout *c;
>+{
>+       bzero(c, sizeof c);
> }
>
>That doesn't look correct, does it?

Sure doesn't to me.





To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message