From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 28 18:13:36 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8302216A402; Wed, 28 Mar 2007 18:13:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 701B813C455; Wed, 28 Mar 2007 18:13:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C6D21A4D8E; Wed, 28 Mar 2007 11:13:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 908E0513EB; Wed, 28 Mar 2007 14:13:35 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 14:13:35 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway To: Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav Message-ID: <20070328181335.GA24652@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20070323212254.54F7D73039@freebsd-current.sentex.ca> <20070323214145.GA3822@krapfengeist> <46044D6C.1070304@samsco.org> <86648lsmmu.fsf@dwp.des.no> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <86648lsmmu.fsf@dwp.des.no> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: Matteo Riondato , i386@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org, FreeBSD Tinderbox Subject: Re: [head tinderbox] failure on i386/i386 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 18:13:36 -0000 On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 12:11:53PM +0200, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote: > Scott Long writes: > > The tinderboxes have stricter compile flags than the normal buildworld > > environment. The hope is that we'll be able to go to -O2 as the default > > optimization someday, which requires the stricter flags. I think what > > you're missing here is the -fstrict-aliasing flag. > > No, the tinderbox just uses -O2 (which implies -fno-strict-aliasing). No, it implies -fstrict-aliasing, which is why the tinderbox often breaks on code that was tested 100% correctly by the committer prior to running with your nonstandard flags ;) Kris