From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Mar 4 03:56:32 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id DAA24654 for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 4 Mar 1996 03:56:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.digital.com ([204.123.2.50]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id DAA24649 for ; Mon, 4 Mar 1996 03:56:30 -0800 (PST) From: garyj@frt.dec.com Received: from cssmuc.frt.dec.com by mail1.digital.com (5.65 EXP 4/12/95 for V3.2/1.0/WV) id AA13201; Mon, 4 Mar 1996 03:52:13 -0800 Received: from localhost by cssmuc.frt.dec.com; (5.65v3.2/1.1.8.2/14Nov95-0232PM) id AA25459; Mon, 4 Mar 1996 12:51:47 +0100 Message-Id: <9603041151.AA25459@cssmuc.frt.dec.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.4 10/10/95 To: hackers%freebsd.org@inet-gw-1.pa.dec.com In-Reply-To: Message from J Wunsch of Mon, 04 Mar 96 10:46:55 +0100. Reply-To: gjennejohn@frt.dec.com Subject: Re: using ddb to debug a double-panic? Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Mon, 04 Mar 96 12:51:47 +0100 X-Mts: smtp Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk j@uriah.heep.sax.de writes: > As David Greenman wrote: > > I thought about writing some extensions to "trace" to allow it to > > apply a (operator supplied) 'stack offset' that would be used to > > adjust the pushed FPs (for precisely the purpose of what you're > > requesting above). > > What's wrong with the ``dyadic frame specification''? > > (``frame new-fp new-pc'') > does that work in ddb (I haven't used it enough to know :-) ? --- Gary Jennejohn (work) gjennejohn@frt.dec.com (home) Gary.Jennejohn@munich.netsurf.de (play) gj@freebsd.org