Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2020 16:06:24 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 249025] description of scanf %u incorrectly says "optionally signed" (patch included) Message-ID: <bug-249025-9-VuEzkXBFpw@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-249025-9@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-249025-9@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D249025 --- Comment #2 from wbe@psr.com --- Looks like you're correct and I was wrong. From what I now see in C90, C99, C++, man strtoul(), etc. the specs call for no meaningful difference betwee= n %u and %d these days in what of the input string is read and how it's interpre= ted. I thought they used to be different. Sorry for the bother. -WBE --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-249025-9-VuEzkXBFpw>