From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 1 06:00:17 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC3B037B404 for ; Tue, 1 Apr 2003 06:00:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from skeleton.phys.spbu.ru (skeleton.phys.spbu.ru [195.19.235.112]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 235CF43F3F for ; Tue, 1 Apr 2003 06:00:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kab00m@lich.phys.spbu.ru) Received: from laura.aero.ru (laura.aero.ru [10.10.10.10]) by skeleton.phys.spbu.ru (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h31DmYuY020901; Tue, 1 Apr 2003 17:48:35 +0400 (MSD) Received: from laura.aero.ru (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by laura.aero.ru (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h31DxQEC001359; Tue, 1 Apr 2003 17:59:26 +0400 (MSD) Received: (from kab00m@localhost) by laura.aero.ru (8.12.6/8.12.6/Submit) id h31DxOVB001358; Tue, 1 Apr 2003 17:59:24 +0400 (MSD) Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2003 17:59:23 +0400 From: Dima Veselov To: Scott Mitchell Message-ID: <20030401135923.GB352@lich.phys.spbu.ru> References: <20030401093247.GA352@lich.phys.spbu.ru> <20030401131732.GA30248@tuatara.fishballoon.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030401131732.GA30248@tuatara.fishballoon.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Organization: St.Petersburg State University cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CRW-600 MultiCard reader X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2003 14:00:17 -0000 On Tue, Apr 01, 2003 at 02:17:33PM +0100, Scott Mitchell wrote: Hello, Scott! > > Hello there! > > I have problem using Multi-Card reader CRW-600 6-in-1 > Hi Dima, First of all, I want to thank you for your pretty detailed answer. Thanks. Your are right, it is 6-in-1 device with 4 slots. > first one is recognised automatically. Try this: > # camcontrol rescan 1:0:1 I have tried these commands and more (up to 1:0:10 as experiment) and now I have [root@laura dev]$ camcontrol devlist at scbus0 target 3 lun 0 (pass0,da0) at scbus0 target 5 lun 0 (pass1,cd0) at scbus0 target 6 lun 0 (pass2,cd1) at scbus1 target 0 lun 0 (da1,pass3) at scbus1 target 0 lun 1 (da2,pass4) at scbus1 target 0 lun 2 (da3,pass5) at scbus1 target 0 lun 3 (da4,pass6) at scbus1 target 0 lun 4 (pass7) at scbus1 target 0 lun 5 (da5,pass8) at scbus1 target 0 lun 6 (da6,pass9) at scbus1 target 0 lun 7 (da7,pass10) at scbus1 target 0 lun 8 (pass11) at scbus1 target 0 lun 9 (da8,pass12) at scbus1 target 0 lun 10 (da9,pass13) Something strange happens when I try to use it - when camcontrol rescans devices kernel says, that da* device attached. On first four devices it says 'no medium present', and on other it says medium present with size=0. Well, it is great that now I have 4 devices, but - CF slot is first (da1) and it was present before, and as I assume it is to be mountable. There is CF card - 128 Mb, it worked before and it was used in this reader (under Windows). So, problem is not in the card or reader. As the kernel says I have no medium present in all four slots - da1-da4 it says that devices da1-da4 are not configured. As I noticed in your old letter - when you made rescan, kernel found card 62Mb, but mine do not find it at all. I tried to remake da1-da4 device nodes in /dev, I tried fdisk, but every time got a message: da1: device not configured. Removing/inserting CF card doesn't make anything to change. Have any ideas why it can happen or how I can debug reader behaviour? By the way, does not this two commands say card is somehow recognized?: [root@laura dev]$ camcontrol periphlist 1:0:1 camcontrol: cam_real_open_device: couldn't open passthrough device /dev/pass4 cam_real_open_device: No such file or directory [root@laura dev]$ camcontrol periphlist 1:0:0 da1: generation: 8 index: 1 status: MORE pass3: generation: 8 index: 2 status: LAST Thanks for attached letter, I hope it was pushed in archives for future users search. I hope your letter I'm now replying did so too. -- Sincerelly yours