From owner-freebsd-ports Thu Sep 27 11:55:34 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from roaming.cacheboy.net (orb60.arach.net.au [203.30.47.126]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52C2037B40C; Thu, 27 Sep 2001 11:55:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from adrian@localhost) by roaming.cacheboy.net (8.11.6/8.11.1) id f8RIxDY04325; Thu, 27 Sep 2001 20:59:13 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from adrian) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 20:59:12 +0200 From: Adrian Chadd To: ports@freebsd.org Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: closing down the squid22/23 ports? Message-ID: <20010927205912.E4232@roaming.cacheboy.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi all, Pardon the cross-posting. :-) I'd like to look at closing down / making inactive the squid22 and squid23 ports. The squid-2.2 and squid-2.3 codebases have been inactive and largely unsupported by the squid developers (read: myself inclusive here) for some time now, and I'd like to point users at the actively developed/maintained squid branch. Squid-2.5 is also in the pipeline for release soon, and I don't think there is a point in having 4 squid ports. What do people think? (please CC me, I'm currently not on the ports/hackers list for various time-related reasons..) Thanks! Adrian -- Adrian Chadd "Programming is like sex: One mistake and you have to support for a lifetime." -- rec.humor.funny To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message