From owner-freebsd-ports Wed Dec 13 15:49:48 2000 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 13 15:49:46 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from puck.firepipe.net (poynting.physics.purdue.edu [128.210.146.58]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB0A437B402 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2000 15:49:46 -0800 (PST) Received: by puck.firepipe.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0D18618C4; Wed, 13 Dec 2000 18:49:46 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 18:49:46 -0500 From: Will Andrews To: Brett Taylor Cc: clefevre@cybercable.fr, Peter Pentchev , freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ports/23355: ports/latex2html upgrader to 99.2b8 Message-ID: <20001213184945.A1873@puck.firepipe.net> Reply-To: Will Andrews References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from brett@peloton.runet.edu on Mon, Dec 11, 2000 at 10:40:06AM -0500 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.2-STABLE i386 Sender: will@puck.firepipe.net Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Mon, Dec 11, 2000 at 10:40:06AM -0500, Brett Taylor wrote: > It's not a rule, but a courtesy. I don't agree with the maintainer getting the patches before the rest of the world. While I agree that sending the maintainer the patches is a good idea, it should be done as part of the send-pr simultaneously.. not one before the other. The rest of the world has no idea when the maintainer originally got the patches, if it doesn't happen that way. -- wca To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message