From owner-freebsd-advocacy Mon Feb 5 9:47:17 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from peorth.iteration.net (peorth.iteration.net [208.190.180.178]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DBBE37B4EC for ; Mon, 5 Feb 2001 09:47:00 -0800 (PST) Received: by peorth.iteration.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 0F79857611; Mon, 5 Feb 2001 11:47:30 -0600 (CST) Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2001 11:47:29 -0600 From: "Michael C . Wu" To: Mike Doyle Cc: advocacy@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Good "advocacy" article in this weeks BYTE Message-ID: <20010205114729.B98288@peorth.iteration.net> Reply-To: "Michael C . Wu" References: <3.0.5.32.20010205171028.00833690@199.107.2.1> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <3.0.5.32.20010205171028.00833690@199.107.2.1>; from relyod@cooperationireland.org on Mon, Feb 05, 2001 at 05:10:28PM +0000 X-PGP-Fingerprint: 5025 F691 F943 8128 48A8 5025 77CE 29C5 8FA1 2E20 X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x8FA12E20 Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, Feb 05, 2001 at 05:10:28PM +0000, Mike Doyle scribbled: | There's a nice article (favourably) comparing FreeBSD 4.1.1 to | Linux 2.4 (didn't say which distro) in this week's BYTE. For interested parties: The url is at http://www.byte.com/column/BYT20010130S0010 -- +------------------------------------------------------------------+ | keichii@peorth.iteration.net | keichii@bsdconspiracy.net | | http://peorth.iteration.net/~keichii | Yes, BSD is a conspiracy. | +------------------------------------------------------------------+ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message