From owner-cvs-CVSROOT Mon Aug 21 07:28:45 1995 Return-Path: cvs-CVSROOT-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.FreeBSD.org (8.6.11/8.6.6) id HAA22330 for cvs-CVSROOT-outgoing; Mon, 21 Aug 1995 07:28:45 -0700 Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [192.216.222.226]) by freefall.FreeBSD.org (8.6.11/8.6.6) with ESMTP id HAA22311 ; Mon, 21 Aug 1995 07:28:27 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) with SMTP id HAA11088; Mon, 21 Aug 1995 07:28:12 -0700 To: davidg@Root.COM cc: "Rodney W. Grimes" , CVS-commiters@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-CVSROOT@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: CVSROOT editinfo In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 21 Aug 1995 07:16:21 PDT." <199508211416.HAA00954@corbin.Root.COM> Date: Mon, 21 Aug 1995 07:28:12 -0700 Message-ID: <11085.809015292@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: cvs-CVSROOT-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > Accepted policy? Who accepted it?? The first I heard about it is with your > "reminder". In all fairness to Rod, I remember this as our policy as well and I do recall it being discussed when we first added the `Submitted By' and `Obtained From' fields. We decided, according to my recollection, to use the following methodology: non-freefall user: Joe Blow freefall user: joe If you check the commit logs, I do believe that you'll find them to be pretty consistent with this convention. Jordan