From owner-freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 25 17:05:15 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 695C8106566C for ; Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:05:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com (mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.199]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16DDD8FC14 for ; Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:05:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from vanquish.ws.pitbpa0.priv.collaborativefusion.com (vanquish.ws.pitbpa0.priv.collaborativefusion.com [192.168.2.162]) (SSL: TLSv1/SSLv3,256bits,AES256-SHA) by wingspan with esmtp; Wed, 25 Jun 2008 13:05:13 -0400 id 00056438.48627ACA.00016689 Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 13:04:01 -0400 From: Bill Moran To: Boris Samorodov Message-Id: <20080625130401.e03329dc.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> In-Reply-To: <93253417@bb.ipt.ru> References: <62852722@bb.ipt.ru> <20080625103721.bdc7daee.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> <93253417@bb.ipt.ru> Organization: Collaborative Fusion X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.8 (GTK+ 2.12.9; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: is nfs mount inside jail possible? X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:05:15 -0000 In response to Boris Samorodov : > On Wed, 25 Jun 2008 10:37:21 -0400 Bill Moran wrote: > > > In response to Boris Samorodov : > > > > > > ... nfs seems not to be jail friendly. Here is the question at > > > subject. Thanks! > > > You can NFS mount on the host, and it will be visible within the jail. > > Don't know if that helps your situation or not. > > Yep, I know it. I'd prefer to use mounts within a jail. They should be > dynamic: a process mounts it, uses and unmounts. Otherwise there will > be too many mounts... How many is too many? Why do you think that number is too many? You could run the automounter on the host. -- Bill Moran Collaborative Fusion Inc. http://people.collaborativefusion.com/~wmoran/ wmoran@collaborativefusion.com Phone: 412-422-3463x4023