Date: Fri, 9 May 1997 10:12:28 -0600 (MDT) From: Wes Peters - Softweyr LLC <softweyr@xmission.com> To: un_x@anchorage.net (Steve Howe) Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: AMD K5 Chip(Does it work with FreeBSD) Message-ID: <199705091612.KAA27550@xmission.xmission.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.95q.970509033710.378F-100000@aak.anchorage.net> from "Steve Howe" at May 9, 97 03:38:00 am
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> i wonder what going to happen with Intel moving off in
> a proprietary direction (from what i hear ...)
Snort Chuckle Gasp. What a sense of humor! Intel "moving off in a
proprietary direction" -- as if they've ever made anything that wasn't
proprietary before! ;^)
I doubt Cyrix, AMD, et al will have any problems stealing^h^h^h^h^h^h^h^h
reverse engineering anything new Intel comes up with.
I have FreeBSD running on several K5s around here, from 75 to 133 "PR."
I'll be trying the 166 soon. FreeBSD runs wonderfully on the K5 -- more
bang for the buck *always* works for me. ;^)
--
"Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?"
Wes Peters Softweyr LLC
http://www.xmission.com/~softweyr softweyr@xmission.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199705091612.KAA27550>