Date: Sun, 15 Oct 1995 23:59:43 +0100 (MET) From: J Wunsch <j@uriah.heep.sax.de> To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org (FreeBSD hackers) Subject: Re: A couple problems in FreeBSD 2.1.0-950922-SNAP Message-ID: <199510152259.XAA22206@uriah.heep.sax.de> In-Reply-To: <dOpFKWmyH5@ache.dialup.demos.ru> from "=?KOI8-R?Q?=E1=CE=C4=D2=C5=CA_=FE=C5=D2=CE=CF=D7?=" at Oct 15, 95 08:25:07 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
As =?KOI8-R?Q?=E1=CE=C4=D2=C5=CA_=FE=C5=D2=CE=CF=D7?= wrote: > > I have nothing against reverting this variable to > DISABLE_STARTUP_LOCALE f.e. If you remember I plan to make startup locale > as default for all program, but some peoples disagree, so I introduce > ENABLE_STARTUP_LOCALE. The ENABLE_STARTUP_LOCALE hack is nice for those programs that are not even aware of locale's. The base utilities however should be aware if it, and handle it themselves. As i said in another message, except perhaps daemons. All other utilities that use the isctype()-style macros/functions should use it. -- cheers, J"org joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199510152259.XAA22206>