From owner-freebsd-current Sat Sep 21 20:22:30 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA66D37B401 for ; Sat, 21 Sep 2002 20:22:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp-send.myrealbox.com (smtp-send.myrealbox.com [192.108.102.143]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 626D443E4A for ; Sat, 21 Sep 2002 20:22:29 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from wa1ter@hotmail.com) Received: from hotmail.com wa1ter@smtp-send.myrealbox.com [67.114.255.156] by smtp-send.myrealbox.com with NetMail SMTP Agent $Revision: 3.12 $ on Novell NetWare via secured & encrypted transport (TLS); Sat, 21 Sep 2002 21:22:29 -0600 Message-ID: <3D8D372B.9040806@hotmail.com> Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2002 20:21:15 -0700 From: walt Organization: none User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.1) Gecko/20020921 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: libc error question answered (partly) References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG walt wrote: > My guess is that the syntax of 'sort' has changed since lorder > was modified in March of 2001(?) David Wolfskill just pointed out to me that the behavior of 'sort' is completely different in -STABLE, which I've just confirmed. Does anyone else see this behavior in -CURRENT? What happens if you type 'sort +1' on your -CURRENT machine? This will be the last time (tonight) that I reply to my own post :-) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message