From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 1 07:00:30 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B19F116A4CF for ; Mon, 1 Dec 2003 07:00:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from gw.celabo.org (gw.celabo.org [208.42.49.153]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3997A43FD7 for ; Mon, 1 Dec 2003 07:00:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nectar@celabo.org) Received: from madman.celabo.org (madman.celabo.org [10.0.1.111]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "madman.celabo.org", Issuer "celabo.org CA" (verified OK)) by gw.celabo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D48C4548A4; Mon, 1 Dec 2003 09:00:07 -0600 (CST) Received: by madman.celabo.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 93BEB6D455; Mon, 1 Dec 2003 09:00:07 -0600 (CST) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2003 09:00:07 -0600 From: "Jacques A. Vidrine" To: Tillman Hodgson Message-ID: <20031201150007.GI99428@madman.celabo.org> Mail-Followup-To: "Jacques A. Vidrine" , Tillman Hodgson , freebsd-security@freebsd.org References: <02be01c3b5a6$a78a8ea0$b901320a@komi.mts.ru> <20031201142936.GD99428@madman.celabo.org> <20031201144304.GB90713@seekingfire.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20031201144304.GB90713@seekingfire.com> X-Url: http://www.celabo.org/ User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i-ja.1 cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Kerberized applications in FreeBSD 5.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Security issues [members-only posting] List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2003 15:00:30 -0000 On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 08:43:04AM -0600, Tillman Hodgson wrote: > On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 08:29:36AM -0600, Jacques A. Vidrine wrote: > > FTP is tricky--- I'm not touching it until we decide which FTP is the > > *real* FTP. > > Could you explain this a bit further? I'm pretty familiar with Kerberos > and I wasn't aware of this issue. I think I might be mis-parsing your > email to mean "competing standards" when it might mean "competing > clients", in which case it makes more sense :-) Yes, sorry--- we have more than one FTP implementation in FreeBSD. Cheers, -- Jacques Vidrine NTT/Verio SME FreeBSD UNIX Heimdal nectar@celabo.org jvidrine@verio.net nectar@freebsd.org nectar@kth.se