Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2000 13:06:01 -0800 (PST) From: Hugh LaMaster <lamaster@nren.nasa.gov> To: Hugh LaMaster <lamaster@george.arc.nasa.gov> Cc: Mike Spengler <mks@networkcs.com>, Hirofumi ABE <abe.hirofumi@lab.ntt.co.jp>, Kenjiro Cho <kjc@csl.sony.co.jp>, freebsd-atm@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Traffic shaping on HARP Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.05.10003011257320.9448-100000@kinkajou.arc.nasa.gov> In-Reply-To: <200003012006.OAA95134@us.networkcs.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 1 Mar 2000, Mike Spengler wrote: > Hugh LaMaster claims: > > > > > I can't decide which box is wrong BSD or cisco, but the MTU size of 9180 > > > seems to have some problems. > > > > Cisco ATM MTU is 4470 by default; if you want 9180 you have : > > default? Does 9180 show up in an RFC somewhere?) > > > Yes. See RFC 2225, Section 7. Thanks. It is there. The way it is worded, I can see either interpretation: that the default should always be 9180, or, only that that 9180 has to be supported. Regardless, lots of networks are set at 4470, so, pragmatically, 4470 is probably a good compromise. How much performance difference do you see between 4470 and 9180? -- Hugh LaMaster, M/S 233-21, Email: lamaster@nren.nasa.gov NASA Ames Research Center Or: lamaster@nas.nasa.gov Moffett Field, CA 94035-1000 Or: lamaster@george.arc.nasa.gov Phone: 650/604-1056 Disc: Unofficial, personal *opinion*. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-atm" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.4.05.10003011257320.9448-100000>