From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 4 17:28:22 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E793B106566B; Fri, 4 Jun 2010 17:28:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (troutmask.apl.washington.edu [128.208.78.105]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C89948FC19; Fri, 4 Jun 2010 17:28:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (localhost.apl.washington.edu [127.0.0.1]) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o54HSMPh085054; Fri, 4 Jun 2010 10:28:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: (from sgk@localhost) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id o54HSMSD085053; Fri, 4 Jun 2010 10:28:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sgk) Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2010 10:28:22 -0700 From: Steve Kargl To: Doug Barton Message-ID: <20100604172822.GA85023@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <20100604152605.GA80277@freebsd.org> <4C0930E3.3030301@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4C0930E3.3030301@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: Roman Divacky , current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [INFO]: import of clang/LLVM to happen on June 9th X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Jun 2010 17:28:23 -0000 On Fri, Jun 04, 2010 at 09:59:15AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: > On 06/04/10 08:26, Roman Divacky wrote: > >Dear current@ > > > >On June 9th, we are importing clang/LLVM into FreeBSD HEAD. > > Excellent news! :) I am in favor of this, and look forward to a day of > using a FreeBSD system compiled as much as possible with clang. > > During the ongoing discussion there were 2 items identified that I was > particularly interested in, and I personally would like to see those > items resolved before the clang import: > > 1. Have uname report the compiler (and compiler version?) that the > kernel was compiled with. This can likely be done through newvers.sh > easily enough. > Is it possible to load a clang compiled module into a gcc compiled kernel (and vice versa)? If the answer is "yes", then a change to uname may produce meaningless and somewhat misleading information. -- Steve