Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2010 10:28:22 -0700 From: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> To: Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org> Cc: Roman Divacky <rdivacky@freebsd.org>, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [INFO]: import of clang/LLVM to happen on June 9th Message-ID: <20100604172822.GA85023@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> In-Reply-To: <4C0930E3.3030301@FreeBSD.org> References: <20100604152605.GA80277@freebsd.org> <4C0930E3.3030301@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Jun 04, 2010 at 09:59:15AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: > On 06/04/10 08:26, Roman Divacky wrote: > >Dear current@ > > > >On June 9th, we are importing clang/LLVM into FreeBSD HEAD. > > Excellent news! :) I am in favor of this, and look forward to a day of > using a FreeBSD system compiled as much as possible with clang. > > During the ongoing discussion there were 2 items identified that I was > particularly interested in, and I personally would like to see those > items resolved before the clang import: > > 1. Have uname report the compiler (and compiler version?) that the > kernel was compiled with. This can likely be done through newvers.sh > easily enough. > Is it possible to load a clang compiled module into a gcc compiled kernel (and vice versa)? If the answer is "yes", then a change to uname may produce meaningless and somewhat misleading information. -- Steve
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100604172822.GA85023>