From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 25 15:56:35 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D25237B401; Wed, 25 Jun 2003 15:56:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from storm.FreeBSD.org.uk (storm.FreeBSD.org.uk [194.242.157.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 096E144011; Wed, 25 Jun 2003 15:56:34 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mark@grondar.org) Received: from storm.FreeBSD.org.uk (Ugrondar@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by storm.FreeBSD.org.uk (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h5PMuW1f094455; Wed, 25 Jun 2003 23:56:32 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mark@grondar.org) Received: (from Ugrondar@localhost)h5PMuW2Q094454; Wed, 25 Jun 2003 23:56:32 +0100 (BST) X-Authentication-Warning: storm.FreeBSD.org.uk: Ugrondar set sender to mark@grondar.org using -f Received: from grondar.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])h5PMpqHh088143; Wed, 25 Jun 2003 23:51:52 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mark@grondar.org) From: Mark Murray Message-Id: <200306252251.h5PMpqHh088143@grimreaper.grondar.org> To: John Baldwin In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 25 Jun 2003 16:37:00 EDT." Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 23:51:52 +0100 Sender: mark@grondar.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=5.0 tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,FROM_NO_LOWER,IN_REP_TO, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES version=2.55 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp) cc: current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ACPI stuff to make Libretto 110CT work X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 22:56:35 -0000 John Baldwin writes: > > On 24-Jun-2003 Mark Murray wrote: > > Hi > > > > You (?) gave me these patches at least 6 months ago, and they've > > been working for my Libretto ever since then. Is it OK if I commit > > them? > > No, not quite yet. Those are rather hackish and I didn't develop > them, one of the other ACPI guys did. OK. Can we work on this, then? The patches are developing a bit of a following of folks who would _love_ to see them committed. :-) What is needed? M -- Mark Murray iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH