From owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 27 21:20:06 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 640B616A4CE for ; Thu, 27 Jan 2005 21:20:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rogue.ncsl.nist.gov (rogue.ncsl.nist.gov [129.6.101.41]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D92FF43D49 for ; Thu, 27 Jan 2005 21:20:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ian.soboroff@nist.gov) Received: from rogue.ncsl.nist.gov.nist.gov (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])j0RLJxuq031068; Thu, 27 Jan 2005 16:19:59 -0500 From: Ian Soboroff To: Nate Lawson References: <20050125193240.8F9145D08@ptavv.es.net> <41F94F90.2020006@root.org> Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 16:19:59 -0500 In-Reply-To: <41F94F90.2020006@root.org> (Nate Lawson's message of "Thu, 27 Jan 2005 12:31:12 -0800") Message-ID: <9cfzmyutvr4.fsf@rogue.ncsl.nist.gov> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Resume problem with mouse, 5.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: ACPI and power management development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 21:20:06 -0000 Nate Lawson writes: > Attached, for convenience. BTW, does anyone have problems introduced > when running with this patch or do you think it's safe for MFC? Thanks... I had to Google that up (found in freebsd-mobile). It seems safe to me so far. I haven't tested suspending with devices such as PC Cards, USB, or Firewire devices plugged in. As far as effectiveness goes, Anish says that it hasn't helped suspend time. I can test it this weekend (same laptop model, but I've felt that it did better than not having it). That just means that the power draw during suspend on our laptops isn't covered by this patch. Ian