From owner-freebsd-chat Thu Dec 30 17:37:43 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from ns1.yes.no (ns1.yes.no [195.204.136.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B27115386 for ; Thu, 30 Dec 1999 17:37:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from eivind@bitbox.follo.net) Received: from bitbox.follo.net (bitbox.follo.net [195.204.143.218]) by ns1.yes.no (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id CAA03045; Fri, 31 Dec 1999 02:37:38 +0100 (CET) Received: (from eivind@localhost) by bitbox.follo.net (8.8.8/8.8.6) id CAA88354; Fri, 31 Dec 1999 02:37:38 +0100 (MET) Date: Fri, 31 Dec 1999 02:37:38 +0100 From: Eivind Eklund To: Jonathon McKitrick Cc: Phil Regnauld , freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Uptime ! (507 days and going) Message-ID: <19991231023738.A88312@bitbox.follo.net> References: <19991230161341.61459@ns.int.ftf.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i In-Reply-To: ; from jcm@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org on Thu, Dec 30, 1999 at 03:22:54PM +0000 Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Thu, Dec 30, 1999 at 03:22:54PM +0000, Jonathon McKitrick wrote: > > On Thu, 30 Dec 1999, Phil Regnauld wrote: > > > Argh! Massive facelift, and 3.4-RELEASE instead of 2.2.1 :-) > > Did the revision numbering system change between 2.x and 3.x? The 3.x > branch never has a third revision number. Yes - we pulled the numbers up one notch, to make them better match what people "expect" of version numbers. So, what would have been 3.0.1, 3.0.2, 3.0.5, etc became 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, etc. Eivind. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message