From owner-freebsd-ports Sat Oct 2 19:25:25 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from blaubaer.kn-bremen.de (blaubaer.kn-bremen.de [195.37.179.254]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88EA514EFE for ; Sat, 2 Oct 1999 19:25:13 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nox@saturn.kn-bremen.de) Received: from saturn.kn-bremen.de (uucp@localhost) by blaubaer.kn-bremen.de (8.9.1/8.9.1) with UUCP id EAA12728 for freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG; Sun, 3 Oct 1999 04:19:19 +0200 Received: (from nox@localhost) by saturn.kn-bremen.de (8.9.3/8.8.5) id EAA17415 for freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG; Sun, 3 Oct 1999 04:15:04 +0200 (MET DST) From: Juergen Lock Date: Sun, 3 Oct 1999 04:15:04 +0200 To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: X resources and ports that just USE_XLIB Message-ID: <19991003041504.C12718@saturn.kn-bremen.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.7i Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I'm trying to update audio/rosegarden and just found out it cannot find its X resources as it doesn't USE_X_PREFIX, just USE_XLIB which means it installs in /usr/local... and it of course(?) looks for the resources in /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/app-defaults. Btw I seem to remember when that update was submitted it actually did install into /usr/X11R6, any special reason why that was changed? Or does it actually work for anyone the way it is in the tree now? (Sure i could probably patch it to look in /usr/local/lib/X11/app-defaults instead (or something like that), but wouldn't that be a bit of an, err, odd place to put X resources?) Confused, but only slightly... :) -- Juergen Lock (remove dot foo from address to reply) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message